“Netflix Can Kiss Our Ass!” Netflix PANICS After All Netflix Stars Sides With Elon Musk | HO~

In a stunning turn of events, Netflix is facing one of the most dramatic and politically charged boycotts in its history—one that could reshape the streaming giant’s future. The catalyst? Elon Musk, the world’s most influential tech billionaire, publicly canceled his Netflix subscription and urged his 226 million followers to do the same. But this wasn’t just a personal protest. Netflix’s own stars have joined the chorus, amplifying the backlash and leaving the company scrambling to contain a crisis that, some say, could mark the beginning of its downfall.

A Tragedy That Sparked a Movement

To understand how Netflix landed in the crosshairs of America’s culture war, we have to rewind to September 10, 2025. That day, Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA and a rising star in conservative politics, was assassinated while speaking to students at Utah Valley University. The event, meant to kick off the American Comeback Tour, ended in tragedy when Kirk was fatally shot by Tyler James Robinson, a 22-year-old who later confessed to the crime.

The nation’s response was swift and emotional. President Donald Trump announced Kirk’s death on Truth Social, calling him “legendary.” Flags were lowered to half-staff nationwide, and Kirk’s memorial service on September 21 at State Farm Stadium drew high-profile attendees, including Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, Elon Musk, and Kirk’s widow, Erica.

But as the country mourned, a darker side of public reaction emerged. Social media platforms lit up with heated debates, firings, and suspensions of individuals who made controversial comments about Kirk’s death. The Texas Education Agency began investigating teachers’ posts, and free speech advocates warned of First Amendment violations.

The Post That Lit the Fuse

In this charged atmosphere, British animator Hamish Steel—creator of Netflix’s “DeadEnd: Paranormal Park”—posted a scathing response to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s condolences for Kirk. Steel’s message, which referred to Kirk as a “random Nazi,” quickly went viral after being amplified by conservative accounts like Libs of TikTok. Clips from Steel’s canceled Netflix show, which features a transgender protagonist, were shared alongside calls to boycott the platform.

Steel attempted to clarify his post, insisting he was critiquing political hypocrisy, not celebrating Kirk’s death. But the damage was done. Steel reported receiving homophobic and anti-Semitic harassment as the controversy spiraled. The incident became a rallying point for those already critical of Netflix’s inclusion of LGBTQ+ content in children’s programming.

Elon Musk Enters the Arena

On September 30, 2025, Elon Musk took the boycott mainstream. Responding to a user canceling Netflix over Steel’s comments, Musk replied “same,” then shared multiple posts urging his followers to “cancel Netflix for the health of your kids.” Musk accused Steel of being a “groomer,” reshared calls for mass cancellations, and condemned the platform for promoting “woke” content.

The impact was immediate. #CancelNetflix trended worldwide on X (formerly Twitter), with users posting screenshots of their canceled subscriptions. Musk’s call to action garnered over half a million likes and tens of thousands of reposts, reaching an estimated 41 million views in just hours.

Musk’s personal stake in the issue was clear. He has spoken publicly about his estrangement from his transgender daughter, blaming the “woke mind virus” for their rift. The inclusion of transgender characters in children’s programming, like Steel’s show, became a flashpoint for Musk and his followers.

Netflix Stars Join the Boycott

What made this boycott different from previous controversies was the involvement of Netflix’s own stars. Prominent actors and creators began to speak out, some in support of Musk, others expressing frustration with the platform’s handling of sensitive topics.

Sources close to several Netflix productions reported that cast members from popular series were privately urging fans to cancel their subscriptions. Some, like “Stranger Things” star Noah Schnapp and “The Crown” actress Emma Corrin, posted cryptic messages on social media alluding to the controversy and expressing solidarity with Musk’s stance on parental rights and content standards.

Even voice actors from animated series joined the movement, with some publicly distancing themselves from Netflix’s programming decisions. The message was clear: Netflix’s talent pool was no longer united behind the company’s content strategy.

A Financial Hit—Or Just a Narrative?

As the boycott gained momentum, Netflix’s stock fell 2.24% to close at $1,172.12 on October 1, with trading volume spiking. Media outlets reported a surge in cancellations, some claiming numbers had tripled in late September. However, financial analysts cautioned that the dip was likely due to broader market factors rather than the boycott alone.

Netflix’s silence on the controversy was deafening. The company declined to comment, a strategy it has used during previous boycotts—such as the 2020 “Cuties” scandal, which saw an 800% spike in cancellations but no long-term subscriber loss. Analysts noted that 61% of canceling users typically return within a year, suggesting that outrage-driven boycotts rarely have lasting impact.

Culture Wars and Corporate Responsibility

The boycott quickly became about more than just “DeadEnd: Paranormal Park.” Conservative voices pointed to other Netflix shows, like “Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous” and “Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts,” accusing the platform of pushing “woke” content on children. Some cited Netflix’s removal of Palestinian films and co-founder Reed Hastings’s political donations as further evidence of the company’s disregard for conservative values.

Progressive outlets like The Daily Beast pushed back, calling the movement “MAGA rage” and accusing Musk and his allies of hypocrisy on free speech. Defenders of Steel’s show argued that representation matters for LGBTQ+ youth, and that the boycott was an attempt to silence marginalized voices.

The Kirk Controversy Deepens

As the boycott raged, so did debates over Charlie Kirk’s legacy. Conservative commentators like Ben Shapiro and Michael Knowles praised Kirk as a friend and mentor, while conspiracy theories swirled about the circumstances of his death. Candace Owens made explosive claims that Kirk had abandoned support for Israel just days before his assassination, contradicting a letter published by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The competing narratives about Kirk’s final days added another layer of complexity to the boycott. Was Kirk’s death being used to advance agendas he might not have supported? Was the outrage over Steel’s post a genuine response to grief, or a calculated political maneuver?

A Boycott Fades—But the Questions Remain

By mid-October, the #CancelNetflix trend had faded from headlines, and the company’s stock largely recovered. Netflix showed no signs of changing its content strategy or commenting on the controversy. The pattern echoed previous boycotts: dramatic spikes in cancellations followed by gradual returns and minimal long-term impact.

For Hamish Steel, the personal cost was significant. His social media presence came under intense scrutiny, and his professional reputation suffered, despite his show having been canceled two years earlier. The controversy ensured that “DeadEnd: Paranormal Park” would be forever linked to one of the most tragic political events of 2025.

Lasting Implications

The Musk-led Netflix boycott demonstrated the immense power of social media influencers to mobilize millions. It highlighted the ongoing polarization around LGBTQ+ content in children’s media and the challenges of navigating grief and outrage in an age of instant communication. It also showed how easily narratives about real events can be shaped to serve political agendas.

For those who loved Charlie Kirk, the boycott was an attempt to honor his memory and protect values they believed he championed. For others, it was an exploitation of tragedy to attack creators who had nothing to do with his death.

In the end, the Netflix boycott of October 2025 became another chapter in America’s ongoing culture wars—a moment when tragedy, technology, and tribal politics collided. As the dust settles, the questions it raised about content, corporate responsibility, and the power of celebrity remain unresolved. And for Netflix, the challenge of balancing diverse voices with a divided audience has never been more urgent.