Yung Miami DRAGS Tyla to Court in $20M Lawsuit Over Stolen Song │ Tyla Is FURIOUS | HO’

The music industry is shaking to its core as a new legal war brews between two of 2025’s biggest names in pop and hip-hop. Yung Miami, one-half of the City Girls, has officially taken Tyla to court, filing a $20 million lawsuit that could change how international collaborations and song sharing work forever.

According to court filings obtained by insiders close to Karishia Brownlee—better known as Yung Miami—the rapper is accusing South African superstar Tyla Laura Seethal, known professionally as Tyla, of stealing her unreleased song “Take Me to Chanel” and repackaging it into Tyla’s upcoming single, “Chanel.”

🧨 The Tweet That Started It All

It all began on October 16, 2025, when Yung Miami dropped a cryptic tweet that sent fans into overdrive:

“Take Me to Chanel is greater than Put Me in Chanel.”

At first, fans assumed it was promotion for her long-awaited solo debut. But then things took a sharp left turn. Miami followed up with a second tweet that read:

“This girl really ran off with my song. I don’t even know how to feel right now.”

Within hours, social media detectives connected the dots. The “girl” in question was none other than Tyla, who had just teased a track titled “Say You Love Me, Then Put Me in Chanel.” The timing was suspicious, the lyrics familiar—and before long, both fanbases were ready to go to war.

💿 The Alleged Theft

According to Miami’s legal team, the story runs deeper than a few similar lyrics. Back in June 2024, both women were in Los Angeles for BET Awards weekend, where they allegedly crossed paths during a private studio session organized by a mutual producer.

Miami claims she played a rough demo of “Take Me to Chanel” for Tyla—a track she’d been working on since March 2025—without suspecting that the song’s signature hook would later reappear in Tyla’s upcoming single.

That hook? Miami’s unreleased lyrics reportedly go:

“Take me to Chanel, buy me what I like.
Put me in Chanel when you send your type.”

Meanwhile, Tyla’s teaser features:

“Say you love me, then put me in Chanel.
You know what I like.”

A musicologist hired by Miami’s lawyers allegedly found a 68% lyrical overlap and an identical rhythmic pattern between the two hooks—“enough to suggest direct inspiration or duplication,” according to the complaint.

⚖️ Inside the $20 Million Lawsuit

Filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, the lawsuit accuses Tyla of copyright infringement, unjust enrichment, and emotional distress. Miami’s team argues her composition predates Tyla’s by seven months, citing metadata from ProTools Cloud that logs her original studio session on March 4, 2025.

The complaint seeks $20 million in damages, claiming that Tyla’s label, Epic Records, unfairly profited from a song concept that rightfully belongs to Miami. According to insiders, the lawsuit also alleges that Tyla’s brand partnerships—particularly with Chanel, Pandora, and Coca-Cola—were “built on the commercial exploitation of stolen intellectual property.”

🔥 Fans Divide, The Internet Erupts

Social media wasted no time picking sides. On X (formerly Twitter), one fan wrote:

“Yung Miami’s song was trash anyway. Tyla did her a favor.”

Another fired back:

“Miami BEEN talking about ‘Take Me to Chanel.’ She played that for Tyla months ago. The proof’s in the timestamps.”

Memes flooded the timeline, remixing the lyrics into fake court posters: “City Girl vs. Pop Princess: The Battle of Chanel.” Within 24 hours, hashtags #TeamTyla and #ProtectYungMiami were trending worldwide.

Even industry insiders chimed in. Producer Hitmaka tweeted, “These studios be dangerous. You play your demo for the wrong person, and it’s over.”

🧾 The Receipts

Miami’s camp claims to have the receipts—studio timestamps, audio stems, and text messages confirming that she previewed her song during a private session Tyla attended. According to court insiders, Miami’s lawyers plan to request Tyla’s studio project files during discovery, including metadata from Tyla’s recording sessions.

“If those files show the same structure or melody,” one source told Hollywood Unlocked, “Tyla’s team is in serious trouble.”

Meanwhile, Tyla’s legal team is reportedly challenging the case’s jurisdiction, arguing that “no binding contract or NDA existed” during the alleged session. They may attempt to move the case to an international copyright tribunal, a move that could delay the proceedings for years.

💅 Tyla’s Calm, Cold Response

While Miami’s online fury fueled headlines, Tyla kept things classy and quiet. She hasn’t addressed the lawsuit directly, but her subtle shade hasn’t gone unnoticed.

In an Instagram post promoting her single, she simply wrote:

“Chanel 10/24.”

Fans called it the “softest clapback in music history.” Others interpreted it as a power move—proof that Tyla wasn’t going to let a lawsuit stop her bag.

Sources close to her label say Epic Records views the lawsuit as “a distraction.” Still, behind closed doors, executives are reportedly “concerned” that the case could jeopardize Tyla’s lucrative partnerships and her Grammy campaign.

💰 Industry Fallout

This case has the entire music industry on edge. One anonymous A&R rep told Complex, “Nobody’s gonna play unreleased demos anymore. Everyone’s scared.”

Music attorneys are also watching closely. If Miami can prove access (that Tyla heard the song) and substantial similarity, she could have a solid case. One entertainment lawyer told TMZ:

“If Yung Miami’s metadata lines up and Tyla’s files show matching BPMs and chord structures, this is textbook infringement.”

Still, experts believe the $20 million figure is a negotiation anchor—a high number meant to push for a settlement worth a few million plus co-writing credit.

🥊 Publicity or Principle?

Critics accuse Miami of using the lawsuit as a publicity stunt to hype her solo rollout. Her fans disagree, insisting that she’s finally standing up for her artistry after years of being overshadowed.

Miami herself addressed the backlash in a now-viral Space session, saying:

“I don’t care what nobody says. This is about respect. This is about protecting my work.”

Some industry insiders, however, speculate that Miami’s team might be leveraging the lawsuit as a strategic career move—a “rebranding moment” that positions her as more than a City Girl, but a legitimate solo artist with creative control.

⚔️ What Happens Next

As of now, Tyla’s “Chanel” is still slated to drop October 24, unless the court grants Miami’s request for a temporary restraining order to halt promotion. Legal experts expect a decision within weeks.

If the TRO is granted, Tyla’s U.S. release could be blocked while international streams proceed. That could cost Epic Records millions in lost marketing momentum.

But if Tyla prevails, she’ll not only keep her single alive but also reinforce her reputation as one of pop’s most unbothered stars.

🎤 The Verdict So Far

This isn’t just a petty feud—it’s a culture clash, a copyright war, and a cautionary tale about sharing music in the digital age.

If Miami wins, she becomes a symbol of artist empowerment—proof that even the underdog can fight back. If she loses, critics will label it a failed PR move and a stain on her rebrand.

Either way, one thing is certain: the world is watching, and the battle of Chanel is only just beginning.

So, are you Team Tyla or Team Yung Miami? Drop your thoughts below—because this might just be the lawsuit that rewrites the rules of modern pop.