In recent months, a figure known as Ally Carter—also referred to as Allison Carter or “Tory”—has emerged online, claiming to be a survivor of sex trafficking and “ritual orgies” held at parties hosted by hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs. Her wide-reaching accusations, purportedly cataloging a list of prominent attendees and those who were “infected” by trauma or worse, have reverberated across social media, forums, and fringe platforms.

Who is Ally Carter?

According to her own account, Carter is a former foster child who was trafficked and forced into abusive gatherings during her teenage years, including alleged “freak‑offs” or “ritual orgies” at venues tied to Diddy. She claims to have filed an affidavit around 2020 recounting her experiences—alleging involvement by celebrities and secret tunnels used to shuttle victimsHowever, her story exists mostly in shadowy corners of the internet and fringe blogs; mainstream media outlets such as CNN or major news websites have not verified or substantiated her claims, raising red flags about credibility

What Claim Did She Make?

Carter alleges that the events were not typical parties but orchestrated “satanic ritual orgies” involving both adults and children—one of whom she describes herself She implicates prominent figures including Oprah, Jay-Z, Denzel Washington, Naomi Campbell, and others, alleging their attendance or involvement in the events behind closed doors

She also claims that Denzel Washington walked out mid‑event, reportedly shouting “You don’t respect anyone!”, reflecting his discomfort with what he witnessed

Did She “Reveal Who Got Infected”?

The article’s title suggests that Carter provided a list of individuals who were “infected” during the orgies—presumably victims or participants negatively impacted. Yet, publicly available summaries of her statements and interviews do not corroborate that she posted an explicit list by name. Most of the details we have are anecdotal and unsourced, often appearing on fringe blogs or social media posts without verification. No standard media verification or legal filings have publicly confirmed such a list.

In short: no reputable independent or mainstream source has confirmed that Carter released a formal “infected list.”

How Has the Public Reacted?

Reactions online are polarized:

Many users in conspiracy forums and platforms such as Reddit claim Carter is making allegations that are impossible to verify—accusing her of spreading conspiracy theories for attention or profit. As one user put it:

This whole Ally Carter thing is a disgusting lie… she just keeps adding more insane stuff… to keep that TikTok money rolling in”

Others express disturbed disbelief:

“Everything is starting to make too much sense. I feel crazy but everything makes too much sense.”

Some question even the existence of Carter, suggesting she might be an AI-generated persona or benefitting from sensationalism:

Carter’s tale appears less credible… there are hundreds of TikTok and YouTube videos… but no major news outlets are covering this situation which is why some suspect this is … fake news.”

Is There Any Verification?

So far, there appears to be no verification:

Major media or credible investigative journalism has not validated her claims.

Legal filings or court documents referencing her testimony have not surfaced.

No evidence of a formal list naming attendees has been published or subpoenaed.

What Can Be Said About the Title?

“Reveals Who Got Infected”—There is no substantiated evidence that Carter provided such a list. The sensational title appears to be a dramatic exaggeration.

She Has List”—If she maintains one privately, it has not been meaningfully disclosed or published in any verified outlet.

Context—Her strongest claims remain in niche forums, blogs, and conspiracy-laden discussions—not mainstream or corroborated sources.

Bottom Line

While the headline suggests a blockbuster disclosure of names (“Who Got Infected”), there is no credible public evidence or listing to support that claim. Ally Carter’s story remains highly controversial and largely unverified, circulating in fringe corners of the internet. Until independent investigations or verified documentation emerges, the bold headline remains speculative—and potentially misleading.