In early 2025, a serious and sensational scandal rocked the worlds of hip-hop and professional sports: a man named Chris Blake Griffith (also known simply as “Chris Blake”) claimed to have leaked direct messages implicating Drake in a secret homosexual relationship with NFL star Stefon Diggs. More shockingly, he alleged that after refusing Diggs’s sexual advances, he was attacked by Diggs’s associates—perhaps even a hired hit—to silence him. The story quickly swept social media, fueling controversy, rumors, denials, and a tangled web of claims and counterclaims.

This article dissects the available evidence, assesses credibility, examines motivations, and explores the broader implications of this alleged affair and attack.

Background & Key Characters

Who Is Chris Blake Griffith?

Chris Blake Griffith is a stylist, marketing manager, and a former associate in Drake’s social and business orbit. He has described himself as someone who navigates both the entertainment and sports worlds, acting as a connector among artists, athletes, and industry personnel.

In January 2025, Griffith posted screenshots on Instagram of what he claimed were private direct messages between himself and Drake, which included references to Drake’s ongoing legal struggles with Universal Music Group and, more explosively, to a hidden relationship involving Stefon Diggs.

Stefon Diggs: NFL Star & Target of Allegations

Stefon Diggs is a widely known NFL wide receiver. In the context of this scandal, Griffith accused Diggs not only of attempting to make sexual advances toward him but also of having orchestrated retaliation when those advances were declined. Allegedly, Diggs’s brother, Darez (also called Marsean), was involved in organizing an assault on Griffith.

Drake’s Role & Position

Drake is a global music superstar with a highly managed public persona. His involvement is largely indirect in this case: he is implicated in the leaked DMs, supposedly caught in a conversation about concealing the alleged affair. Griffith’s narrative suggests that Drake refused to “expose” Diggs, and when Drake declined, Griffith produced the DMs himself

DJ Akademiks, a media personality and rumor tracker, quickly weighed in, calling the DMs fake, and claiming that Drake himself denied their authenticity.

The Allegations Laid Bare

Griffith’s version of events is rife with serious claims:

Secret RelationshipGriffith alleged that he and Diggs shared a clandestine sexual relationship, or at least that Diggs made persistent advances. When Griffith resisted, things turned hostile.

They gon run a narrative about theft to protect the fact that he drugged me … I respectfully live my life as a 100% STRAIGHT MAN that doesn’t dabble in experimentation unlike him…”

Drugging & HarassmentAccording to Griffith, Diggs allegedly drugged him or rendered him vulnerable, then escalated toward assault. The claimed role of drugs added gravity to the accusation.

Attack / Attempted Hit After RejectionThe gravest part of the allegations is that after Griffith turned down Diggs, Diggs allegedly sent men (including his brother, Darez) to assault Griffith, purportedly to suppress the secret. Some versions state it was to “put a hit” on him.

DM Leaks & ManipulationGriffith claimed that Drake declined to support exposing Diggs publicly. In retaliation or frustration, Griffith leaked—or purported to leak—screenshots of his conversations with Drake. He argues these show Drake’s complicity or awareness.

Counterclaims, Denials & Skepticism

While the allegations are sensational, multiple voices raised red flags early on:

DJ Akademiks posted that the DMs were entirely fabricated and that Drake had called Griffith a “rat” for creating them.

Media analysts have pointed out inconsistencies in the screenshots, peculiar phrasing, and signs of potential screenshot tampering.

Some assert Griffith manufactured the narrative to force attention or position himself in the spotlight, especially given Drake’s massive fanbase and Diggs’s high profile.

No public legal records or law enforcement statements have surfaced confirming assault claims, filing of complaints, or arrests tied to these allegations.

Because much of the story revolves around private messages, leaked texts, and unverified social media claims, it remains in the realm of rumor until stronger evidence emerges.

Timeline & Key Events (as best as reconstructible)

Assessing Credibility & Motivations

To evaluate the legitimacy of this scandal, we need to consider potential motives and the viability of evidence:

Motives & Incentives

Griffith’s motivation could include desire for public attention, leverage, or disrupting Drake’s and Diggs’s images. By releasing explosive content, he ensures viral reach.

Drake’s interest in denying or distancing himself is obvious: being tied to a scandal like this would mar his reputation and brand.

Diggs’s camp would naturally aim to defend his public persona and refute damaging claims, especially from a figure like Griffith.

Evidence Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths (if the claims are true):

Direct messages (screenshots) suggest an internal narrative and provide a traceable link.

The assault/attack claim, if verified, would corroborate a retaliation motive.

The involvement of third parties (e.g. Diggs’s brother) adds complexity that’s harder to fabricate convincingly.

Weaknesses / Doubts:

DMs can be manipulated, fabricated, or forged; without metadata verification, their authenticity is uncertain.

Lack of public legal filings or credible police statements weakens the assault claim.

Contradictory statements from respected sources (e.g. DJ Akademiks) call the entire narrative into question.

The dramatic nature (drugging, physical assault, hit attempts) raises the bar of proof; extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Given the high stakes, skepticism is warranted until independent investigation or law enforcement involvement confirms or refutes the assertions.

Broader Context & Implications

On Privacy, Reputation & Celebrity Culture

This scandal underscores the challenges public figures face balancing personal secrets and public perception. The idea that one might be “outed” or accused of concealing sexuality is a potent cultural force—especially in sports and hip-hop communities, where masculinity norms are often rigid.

On Queerness, Stigma & Hypocrisy

The allegation involves same-sex relations, rejection, and retaliation—a triangle that often surfaces in discussions of closeted celebrity figures. Whether or not the claims hold, the narrative taps into real societal tensions around sexuality, secrecy, and image.

On the Power of Social Media Leaks & Narrative Control

Today, a leaked screenshot or social media post can eclipse official statements. Those who control the narrative—or at least inject volatility—often set the terms of public discourse. Whether Griffith is truth-teller or provocateur, he inserted himself into a media ecosystem where attention often outweighs verification.

Potential Risks & Consequences

If proven true, the reputational damage to Diggs, Drake, and their affiliates would be profound.

If false or partly fabricated, Griffith could face defamation claims or legal backlash.

Innocent or unverified claims can erode public trust in serious accusations of assault, making future victims less likely to be believed.

 
What Could Happen Next? (Possible Scenarios)

Law enforcement gets involvedIf Griffith or his supporters file an official complaint of assault or conspiracy, the police may open an investigation that forces testimonies, evidence exchange, and potential legal consequences.

Digital forensic verification of DMs
Metadata, server logs, or insider confirmation could validate or debunk the posted screenshots.

Public statements or apologies (or denials)Drake, Diggs, or their legal teams may issue formal statements, press denials, or threaten legal action against Griffith or media outlets publishing the story.

Media deep dive & independent journalismInvestigative journalists may attempt to corroborate with witnesses, digital records, or third-party testimony.

Fan and public reaction escalationSocial media may continue to amplify rumors, polarize opinion, and demand accountability—even if legal processes advance slowly.

Conclusion

The narrative aroundDrake’s Friend LEAKS His Gay Affair With Stefon Diggs | They Tried to Put a Hit” is emblematic of today’s celebrity rumor‑driven ecosystem—volatile, sensational, and often devoid of immediate verification. Chris Blake Griffith’s claims are dramatic: secret affairs, betrayal, retaliation, and potential violence. Yet credible counterclaims and the absence of confirmed legal records cast serious doubt on the narrative’s integrity.