The public—and particularly Reality TV watchers—have been following the divorce drama between Simon Guobadia and Porsha Williams with keen interest. Porsha, star of The Real Housewives of Atlanta, and Simon, businessman and CEO, married in late 2022 and separated early 2024. Since then, court filings, public statements, and revelations shed light on the financial and legal entanglements that have arisen.

One of the more dramatic recent waves of contention: Simon has stated he will appeal all the way, even to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, after a ruling that he claims is heavily against him. Meanwhile, Porsha appears to have won significant legal wins, including control over certain bills and assets. The question now: What exactly did the court rule? What are Simon’s claims? And how strong are they?

What the Court Actually Ruled

Based on recent credible reporting:

A judge upheld the prenuptial agreement between Simon Guobadia and Porsha Williams.

As part of that ruling, Porsha is receiving $40,000 per month in alimony for the duration of their 14‑month marriage.

36 months, with the lender or mortgage/rent/expenses to be handled under the terms of the court’s decision.

The home remains with arrangements: if Porsha decides to own it, she’d be required to refinance and give Simon 50% equity.

So, Porsha has secured significant financial protections and living arrangements. Many of Simon’s “bills”—expenses tied to the house, mortgage, home‑based living arrangements—are part of what Porsha is being granted use and upkeep over.

Simon’s Response & Promise to Appeal

Simon is not taking the judge’s ruling quietly. Some key points from his responses:

Simon claims he was targeted for financial reasons”, expressing that the prenuptial agreement was not being honored in spirit.

He has stated that he plans to appeal the decision, including possibly taking the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Simon insists that in his previous marriages, he honored prenups without contest. He suggests something was different this time—that Porsha might have entered their marriage without full intent, or that she never intended the marriage to be long‑term.

The Prenuptial Agreement Dispute

A major area of contention is the prenuptial agreement (“prenup”). What is publicly known:

The prenup was signed five days before Simon and Porsha got married (the wedding was November 2022).

Simon’s legal team has argued that Porsha did not sign the prenup in “good faith”, meaning she may have intended from the start not to stay married long‑term, or perhaps misled him.

Porsha, on the other hand, filed court motions to enforce the existing prenup. She has argued that Simon is violating or trying to undermine its terms.

Porsha Won All of Simon’s Bills” — What That Means

The phrase “won all Simon’s bills” is a bit of sensationalism but reflects what judges ordered or permitted. Key financial rulings and orders include:

Porsha was granted exclusive use and possession of the marital home as the divorce proceedings continue.

Simon is responsible for certain expenses tied to the home (mortgage, taxes, insurance, utilities, community dues), though Porsha is only responsible for household bills in some filings.

There are claims by Porsha that while Simon was detained by ICE (February 2025 onward), she paid some of his obligations – like child support for his sons and upkeep for the house.

Thus, “Porsha won all Simon’s bills” is shorthand for many of the financial obligations tied to marital life and the shared home being assigned or ordered in a way that Porsha can live in the house and the legal responsibility for many of those home‑related expenses remains or falls in part upon Simon, even if he contests that.

Legal Basis & Strength of Simon’s Case

How strong is Simon’s legal position in appealing, up to the Supreme Court, as he claims?

Arguments that favor Simon:

If there is evidence that Porsha misrepresented her intent or did not sign the prenup “in good faith,” he could argue that the prenup is invalid or unfair. Courts sometimes invalidate or refuse to enforce prenups if one party lacked proper disclosure, bargaining power, or the agreement was unconscionable at the time it was signed.

If Simon can show the judge misunderstood or misapplied some legal standard in upholding the prenup or in interpreting it, he may get appeal considerations.

Challenges he faces:

Strong precedents in Georgia (their jurisdiction) generally uphold valid prenups when they are properly executed, with appropriate disclosures, and not manifestly unfair.The judge already reviewed and upheld the agreement in the lower court, which means Simon’s burden on appeal is higher: he must show legal or factual error.

The Supreme Court of the United States accepts very few cases. They usually involve constitutional issues, conflicting decisions among appellate courts, or federal law issues. Disputes over a prenup, alimony, and marital home—even if large sums are involved—rarely meet that standard unless there is some federal constitutional issue. So Simon’s promise to take it “to the Supreme Court if I have to” may be more rhetorical than practical.

What’s Not Yet Known

It is not clear whether Simon has filed actual appeals beyond the initial trial court decision (though he has publicly stated his intention).

We do not have full access to all the financial disclosures, which could be material to determining whether the prenup was fairly entered or whether there was any misrepresentation.

We do not know what additional orders (if any) the court made regarding “maintenance” of the home beyond possession, or whether Porsha’s costs for upkeep (insurance, taxes, etc.) will be reimbursed by Simon or offset in some way.

It’s unclear whether any constitutional or federal legal issues are raised that might make a Supreme Court review possible or likely.

Public & Media Reactions

Many fans and viewers of RHOA have taken sides, often seeing Porsha’s legal wins as validation of long‑held suspicions that Simon was trying to control her finances or assets unfairly. Some tweets express sympathy for Porsha, citing her stepping away from income‑earning TV roles, the expense of the marital home, and potential overreach by Simon.

Simon’s statements about being “targeted for financial reasons” and promising to go all the way to “Supreme Court if I have to” have been echoed by media outlets as evidence of how contentious this divorce has become—more than a personal separation, but a widely followed legal showdown.

The Stakes & What’s Next

Given what’s known and what Simon has vowed, here are what to watch for going forward:

Filing of Appeals / Notices: Public court records will show whether Simon officially files an appeal to the Georgia Court of Appeals (or state equivalent) challenging the prenuptial ruling.

Potential Motions to Stay Orders: Because Porsha already has possession and some benefits (like house residence, alimony), Simon may seek to pause or modify those pending appeal outcomes.

Costs & Equity Issues: If Porsha opts to refinance the home and takeover ownership with 50% equity to Simon, how that is evaluated and whether she has to pay him or refinance in a way that balances that will matter.

Public Statements & Media Strategy: Both Porsha and Simon seem to be engaging through interviews and public outlets. Media coverage may influence public sympathy and possibly legal strategy, though courts officially base decisions on law and facts.

Possibility vs Likelihood of Supreme Court Hearing: As noted, Supreme Court of the U.S. reviews very few cases and under narrow criteria. For Simon to succeed in getting to that level, the case would need to raise significant legal questions—ideally constitutional or involving conflict among appellate courts. This seems unlikely based on the info available.

Conclusion

The ongoing divorce case between Simon Guobadia and Porsha Williams has escalated into far more than a private split. Porsha has already secured major favorable outcomes: alimony, exclusive use of the marital home, and financial protection under their prenup as enforced by the court. Simon, meanwhile, insists that these rulings are unfair, vows to appeal—even “all the way to the Supreme Court” if necessary—and maintains he was financially targeted.

While Simon has the right to appeal, the likelihood of overturning the prenuptial agreement or changing the rulings in his favor is uncertain. Much depends on whether he can show legal or factual error in how the agreement was executed or enforced.

For now, Porsha appears to have “won” many of the major immediate financial battles, including what the media characterizes as “taking Simon’s bills.” Whether Simon can reverse any of it in higher courts remains to be seen—and whether the U.S. Supreme Court ever becomes involved is speculative.