Starting early 2025, Tesla—once a beacon of innovation and environmental stewardship—has been thrust into a maelstrom of public backlash and protest. Spearheaded by a movement known as “Tesla Takedown,” demonstrations have erupted globally, fueled by growing disapproval of CEO Elon Musk’s increasingly political profile and alleged overreach into government affairs. This investigation unpacks the origins, actions, and multifaceted impacts of the protests, shedding light on Tesla’s mounting operational, reputational, and financial challenges.

The Genesis of Tesla Takedown

The “Tesla Takedown” movement ignited in early2025 as a grassroots reaction to Elon Musk’s controversial role in government. Having taken a lead position in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—where he spearheaded sweeping job cuts and agency restructuring under the Trump administration—Musk became a polarizing figure. Public frustration over the erosion of federal programs quickly coalesced into protests directed at Tesla, seen as the most visible symbol of Musk’s wealth and power

Activists rallied across more than 250 cities worldwide, organizing peaceful demonstrations at Tesla showrooms, charging stations, and service centers. Protesters called for boycotts, urging people to sell their Tesla vehicles and stock in hopes of impacting Musk’s financial stake and political influence

From Protest to Vandalism: Escalating Tensions

While the movement initially emphasized nonviolent resistance—including picket lines, dance protests (“Tesla Takedown Dance Party!”), and symbolic messaging—it sometimes escalated into acts of vandalism. In Canada, Europe, and the U.S., there were reported incidents of arson, vehicle burnings, graffiti attacks, and extensive property damage

The FBI and Department of Homeland Security designated some of these acts as domestic terrorism. They responded by forming dedicated task forces to investigate suspected attacks involving arson, shooting, and property damage directed at Tesla assets

Social Media, Branding, and Doxing Risks

Beyond physical protests, the campaign expanded into digital arenas. Websites like DogeQuest emerged, publishing personal data of Tesla owners—addresses, emails, and even locations of charging stations—fueling threats of harassment and property vandalism

Pro-Musk narratives also intensified. Musk publicly accused well-known figures such as George Soros, Reid Hoffman, and groups like ActBlue of orchestrating the protests—though no evidence supported these claims .

Brand Damage, Market Fallout, and Consumer Anxiety

The mounting controversy has inflicted measurable damage on Tesla’s brand and operations:

Global sales declined sharply—Q1 2025 vehicle deliveries dropped 13% year-over-year, hitting the lowest since mid-2022

Profit erosion and market share loss became evident: profits fell by two-thirds within the year, and Tesla’s U.S. EV market share dropped below 50%

In Europe, backlash intensified. In Germany, a staggering 94% of surveyed consumers said they would not consider buying a Tesla, following Musk’s nationalist political gestures and support for far-right parties

Despite this,Norway bucked the trend, with a24% year-on-year sales increase in H1 2025—attributed to loyalty, charging infrastructure, and promotions

For owners, the backlash has been deeply personal. In Chicago, drivers reported vandalism, hate notes, and general hostility while on the road. Many felt compelled to decorate or sell their vehicles to distance themselves from the controversy

Protests at Tesla’s Diner and Executive Fallout

Amid this turmoil, Tesla unveiled a retro‑futuristic diner in Hollywood—a venture blending nostalgia and brand identity. Though it lured crowds, it also became a protest site. Activists staged theatrical demos, using Nazi-styled balloons and signs to criticize Musk’s perceived authoritarian tendencies, even drawing comparisons to fascist imagery

Tesla’s internal friction surfaced too. A former employee, Matthew LaBrot, was fired after launching a website critical of Musk’s behavior and joining protests. LaBrot claimed political interference was eroding key support among Tesla’s customer base

+

Corporate Struggle Amid Public Outcry

Today, Tesla faces a compounding crisis: public protests—both physical and online—corporate criticism, sales downturns, and reputational damage. Analysts warn that the problem extends beyond Musk’s political actions to deeper operational vulnerabilities, such as failed product launches (e.g., robotaxis), intensifying competition, legal pressures, and investor unease over overvaluation

img src=”https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/QIIJERFYJEI63MG7RSQU3ZTZVU.jpg&w=1440″ alt=”Elon Musk’s Tesla ‘Master Plan’ disappoints investors – The Washington Post” />

Furthermore, global regulatory pressures and activist resistance seem to be reshaping Tesla’s image from progressive disruptor to a symbol of unchecked corporate and political power.

Conclusion

The Tesla Takedown movement represents a significant turning point for Elon Musk’s automotive empire. Provoked by Musk’s political leadership and contentious actions, protests have evolved into coordinated activism, vandalism, and public shaming—challenging not just Tesla’s market performance, but its identity and goodwill. Though some markets like Norway resist the trend, Tesla now navigates a deeply polarized landscape. Its business recovery will likely demand not only operational agility, but also thoughtful reevaluation of public optics, corporate responsibility, and the role of its CEO in political arenas.