In early 2025, crypto journalist and influencer Tiffany Fong found herself at the center of a whirlwind of bizarre and sensational rumors—one claiming she was pregnant with Elon Musk’s child. But Fong quickly and emphatically shut down the speculation, pushing back against false narratives and refusing to become a party to the headlines. This investigation delves into the origins of the rumor, Musk’s alleged involvement, Fong’s response, and the broader implications for women in the social media spotlight.

 The Origin of the Rumor

The uproar began in December 2024, when Elon Musk unexpectedly unfollowed Tiffany Fong on X (formerly Twitter). At the time, Musk had been engaging frequently with her posts, particularly during her coverage of crypto controversies—most notably the FTX collapse—and her support for Donald Trump. That engagement significantly boosted her visibility and earnings on the platform

Shortly thereafter, a user on X posted a villainous-sounding joke:Breaking: Tiffany Fong pregnant with Elon Musk’s 17th child.” The joke referenced Musk’s well-publicized remarks about wanting to build a “legion” of high-intelligence offspring to address declining birth rates

The Wall Street Journal Report

In April 2025, The Wall Street Journal revealed that Musk had messaged Fong privately, despite never having met her in person, asking if she’d be interested in having his child. The WSJ portrayed this as part of Musk’s broader interest in increasing his progeny—framed by some as a bold, unusual strategy tied to his pro-natalist views

Fong allegedly declined the offer, citing her vision of a more “traditional family setup.” She reportedly confided in friends—including influencer Ashley St. Clair, who has publicly claimed to have a child with Musk—but worried that rejecting such a high-profile proposition could affect her engagement and income on X

Fallout and Fong’s Response

After Musk discovered that Fong had shared the private message with others, reports say he unfollowed her, and Fong’s online engagement and revenue took a sharp dive

In February, amid growing speculation, Fong posted a screenshot of a Daily Mail headline claiming she was carrying Musk’s baby, captioning it: Insane that I need to announce I am NOT pregnant… We live in a clown world.” Her blunt dismissal underscored both her frustration and the absurdity of the rumors .

Then in April, responding to the WSJ article, she wrote on X:

For the record, I did not feed this story to WSJ (or any other outlet) and explicitly asked NOT to be included when I was contacted for comment. If you’re waiting for me to comment publicly, it’s not going to happen. THANKS!”

Fong’s statement made it clear that she did not seek media attention for the story and wanted to step away from the sensationalism.

Who Is Tiffany Fong?

Tiffany Fong is a crypto influencer and self-described “reluctant crypto journalist.” Born on March 19, 1994, in Las Vegas, she graduated from the University of Southern California in 2016 with a degree in journalism and mass communication

Her rise to prominence began when she lost $200,000 during the Celsius Network collapse—an event she candidly documented in a viral YouTube video titled Celsius Network: I LOST $200,000.” This sparked her involvement in crypto reporting and led to exclusive interviews, including those with FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried during his house arrest

On social media, she embraces a quirky persona, with her X bio reading: “I’m a potato. sometimes i interview criminals.” Her following includes over 335,000 on X and roughly 48,000 on YouTube

Analysis: Media Sensationalism Meets Personal Boundaries

The episode spotlights a recurring issue in the digital age: how quickly a bit of social media interaction can snowball into intense speculation—with real consequences. Musk’s public interest drove visibility for Fong, but the fallout from that attention—including financial impact and reputation—reveals the volatility inherent in influencer-platform dynamics.

Fong’s insistence that she did not feed the story to the media reinforces a strong message about consent and privacy, especially when faced with high-stakes rumors. Her refusal to become a “character” in someone else’s sensational story is a powerful affirmation of personal agency.

 Broader Implications

This saga is more than entertainment: it’s a cautionary tale. Influencers operate in a precarious space where engagement can grant visibility—and revenue—but also turn boundaries into spectacle.

For public figures—especially women—this incident emphasizes the importance of transparency, the responsibility of platforms to manage misinformation, and the emotional and economic toll that rumors can inflict.

Conclusion

Tiffany Fong’s forceful rebuttal to the Elon Musk pregnancy allegations underscores her unwillingness to be drawn into controversy she did not start. Despite high-profile engagement from Musk boosting her platform, her refusal to participate in sensationalism and her post-decline financial dip serve as telling examples of how influencer dynamics can shift overnight.

In the end, Fong’s clear message—“I did not feed this story… I asked NOT to be included… If you’re waiting for me to comment publicly, it’s not going to happen.”—reaffirms both her autonomy and her rejection of manufactured narratives.