Candace Owens Quotes the Bible at Jasmine Crockett — Jasmine’s Counter Verse FLOORS the Audience | HO~

LOS ANGELES, CA — The set of America Tonight was charged with anticipation as two of the nation’s most talked-about political figures prepared to face off. Conservative commentator Candace Owens, famous for her razor-sharp rhetoric and unapologetic Christian conservatism, squared off against Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, a rising progressive star from Texas.

What unfolded over the next hour would become one of the most viral moments in modern political television—a debate that challenged stereotypes about faith, politics, and who gets to claim biblical authority.

A Stage Set for Fireworks

The producers of America Tonight knew that pairing Owens and Crockett would generate headlines. Owens, with millions of followers and a reputation for eviscerating progressive opponents, had built her brand on wielding scripture as a political weapon. Crockett, though newer to the national stage, was already respected for her policy expertise and fearless debate style.

But what few viewers expected was that the night’s most explosive moment would not come from policy disagreements or personal attacks, but from a theological showdown that would leave both the studio audience and millions watching at home utterly speechless.

Owens Strikes First

Twenty minutes into the debate, the conversation turned toward social justice programs—a topic Owens had long prepared for. Straightening her burgundy blazer, she delivered her signature move: quoting scripture with the authority of a Sunday morning preacher.

“You know, Congresswoman Crockett,” Owens began, “the fundamental problem with progressives is that you’ve forgotten what the Bible teaches about personal responsibility and the role of government. Let me remind you of what Jesus himself said in the Gospel of Matthew.”

Owens quoted 2 Thessalonians 3:10:

“The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.”

She continued, citing 1 Timothy 5:8:

“Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”

Owens concluded, “The Bible is crystal clear. Charity begins at home, not through big government programs that encourage dependency and undermine family values. So, Congresswoman, how do you reconcile your support for these welfare programs with the clear biblical mandate for personal responsibility?”

Conservative sections of the audience erupted in applause. Owens, confident and poised, appeared to have delivered another knockout punch.

The Calm Before the Storm

But Crockett didn’t flinch. Instead, she sat quietly, a small, enigmatic smile forming as she processed Owens’s challenge. The camera zoomed in, capturing a moment that would soon flood social media as memes and GIFs—the calm before an intellectual storm.

When Crockett finally spoke, her voice was steady and assured. “That’s interesting, Candace. I appreciate your willingness to discuss the Bible’s teachings on social responsibility. But I’m surprised by your choice of verses, especially considering what else scripture has to say.”

Owens’s confidence flickered. Crockett was not deflecting or avoiding the religious debate; she was leaning in, ready to respond on Owens’s own terms.

Crockett’s Scriptural Counterattack

Crockett began by providing historical context for Owens’s Thessalonian citation, explaining how Paul was addressing a specific community issue—some believers had stopped working because they thought Christ’s return was imminent. “Paul was correcting a theological error, not establishing a universal principle against helping those in need,” she explained.

Then, Crockett turned to a broader scriptural foundation for social justice:

“Let’s look at Deuteronomy 15:7-11, where God commands the Israelites:

‘If anyone is poor among your fellow Israelites… do not be hard-hearted or tight-fisted toward them. Rather, be open-handed and freely lend them whatever they need… There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be open-handed toward your fellow Israelites who are poor and needy in your land.’”

The studio fell silent as Crockett’s words echoed with authority. She continued, “Here we see God himself instituting systematic programs for debt forgiveness and resource sharing—mandated by law and enforced by the religious community. It’s not just individual charity; it’s structured, communal support.”

Crockett then cited Acts 2:44-47, describing the early Christian church:

‘All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need…’

“That sounds a lot like the social programs you’re criticizing, doesn’t it?” Crockett remarked.

Owens tried to interrupt, but Crockett pressed on. “If we’re going to talk about biblical mandates, let’s consider the prophets. Isaiah 58:6-12 says:

‘Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice… to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter…’

God demands social action to lift the oppressed and feed the hungry.”

A Debate Transformed

The impact was immediate. Conservative audience members who had been applauding Owens minutes earlier now sat in stunned silence as Crockett demonstrated a depth of biblical knowledge that matched or exceeded Owens’s own.

Crockett wasn’t finished. She invoked Luke 4:18-19, where Jesus outlines his mission:

‘The Spirit of the Lord is on me… to proclaim good news to the poor… to set the oppressed free…’

She explained that Jesus’s reference to “the year of the Lord’s favor” was about the Jubilee year—a time for debt forgiveness and economic reset.

Finally, Crockett cited Matthew 25:34-40, the parable of the sheep and the goats:

‘For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat… Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

She looked directly at Owens. “Jesus said we’ll be judged by how we treat the least among us. How do you reconcile opposing food assistance and healthcare expansion with these commands?”

A Viral Sensation

The studio erupted, but this time applause came from the progressive sections. Owens, usually unshakable, struggled to respond. The script had been flipped. Her strategy of using isolated verses to claim moral authority was overwhelmed by Crockett’s comprehensive, contextual biblical scholarship.

Within minutes, clips of the exchange exploded across social media. The hashtag #CrockettBibleVerse trended nationally, followed by #ProgressivePreacher and #BiblicalSmackdown. Comment sections filled with conservatives admitting they’d never heard those passages before, and progressives celebrating a cultural victory.

Religious scholars weighed in, praising Crockett’s accuracy and depth. Dr. Sarah Martinez, a professor of biblical studies, wrote, “What we witnessed was not just political theater, but genuine theological discourse. Crockett demonstrated the kind of biblical literacy we hope to see in our seminary students.”

African-American churches shared the clips during Sunday services, noting how Crockett had represented the black church tradition of social justice theology on a national stage—a tradition stretching back to abolitionists and civil rights leaders.

Aftermath and Impact

Owens, for once, was quiet on social media in the days following the debate. When she finally responded, she accused Crockett of taking scripture out of context—a charge many found ironic, given Crockett’s comprehensive analysis.

Conservative media outlets struggled to cover the exchange. Some minimized its significance; others tried to challenge Crockett’s interpretations, but her citations were undeniably accurate.

The broader impact was profound. Progressive politicians began incorporating religious language and biblical references into policy arguments. Democratic strategists realized they’d been ceding rhetorical ground by avoiding religious discourse. Media coverage sparked conversations about stereotypes and assumptions regarding faith and political ideology.

Religious voters, particularly those torn between social justice concerns and conservative identity, reported reconsidering which political positions best reflected their faith. Seminary professors assigned the debate as an example of effective public theology. Bible study groups explored the passages Crockett had cited, discovering social justice themes many had never considered.

Internationally, religious and political leaders praised Crockett for showing how faith and progressive politics could be integrated with intellectual rigor and spiritual authenticity.

A Moment That Changed the Conversation

Six months later, analysts consistently ranked Crockett’s biblical counterattack among the year’s most significant political moments. It wasn’t just a personal victory—it was a cultural shift, challenging fundamental assumptions about religion, politics, and moral authority in American public life.

Crockett’s national profile soared, with speaking invitations from religious institutions, universities, and progressive organizations. Her biblical scholarship gave her a unique position in Democratic politics, bridging faith and social justice advocacy.

The story of that debate night became a case study in how expertise and authority can be challenged—and how the most powerful moments in political discourse often come when someone dares to challenge not just their opponent’s arguments, but the very foundations upon which those arguments rest.

Conclusion

Jasmine Crockett’s scriptural response to Candace Owens didn’t just win a debate—it reframed the conversation about faith and politics in America. It reminded viewers that biblical literacy and moral authority are not the exclusive property of any ideological camp, and that the Bible’s teachings on justice and compassion remain as relevant today as they were thousands of years ago.

If you missed this jaw-dropping moment, make sure to watch the replay—and remember, the next time someone claims exclusive rights to scripture, be ready for a counter verse that just might floor the audience.